New system of warnings and errors

Completely new system of warnings, errors and notes was developed. Information about E/W/N is printed in numerical output, if check box Print E/W/N explanation is switched ON, see chapter "Print E/W/N explanation".

Information about E/W/N can be printed in numerical output too, if check box Show Errors/Warnings/Notes is switched ON in Drawing setup 2D, see chapter .

The table looks as the following. There are three main columns:

Index – number of E/W/N (E – error, W – warning, N – note)
Description – the text of E/W/N itself,
Solution – if exist some solution or recommendation for user it is printed in this column

List of Errors

Index	Type	Description	Solution
N0/1	Note	The forces are zero
E0/1	Error	The resistance of the compressive concrete in the virtual concrete strut is exceeded	To increase the thickness of 2D member or to increase the quality of concrete or to change the geometry of reinforcement (position and directions)
E0/2	Error	The angle between directions of reinforcement at upper surface is lesser than minimum angle (15 deg)	To change direction of reinforcement at upper surface
E0/3	Warning	The position of lower reinforcement is above centre of 2D element	To increase thickness of the 2D member or to decrease concrete cover of reinforcement
E0/4	Warning	The position of upper reinforcement is under centre of 2D element	To increase thickness of the 2D member or to decrease concrete cover of reinforcement
E0/5	Error	The angle between directions of reinforcement at lower surface is lesser than minimum angle (15 deg)	To change direction of reinforcement at lower surface
N0/2	Note	The inner lever arm for recalculation of internal forces of was calculated according to formula z =0.9*d, because inner lever arm is not possible to calculate from plane of equilibrium in direction of principal moment (tensile reinforcement , compressive concrete fibre of plane of equilibrium was not found)
N0/3	Note	Check compression strut is not necessary, because statically required reinforcement was not designed in both directions or there is not compression area
N2/1	Note	The statically required tensile reinforcement in the first direction at lower surface was increased due to detailing provisions (minimum ratio of reinforcement)
N2/2	Note	The statically required tensile reinforcement in the second direction at lower surface was increased due to detailing provisions (minimum ratio of tensile reinforcement)
N2/3	Note	The statically required tensile reinforcement in the first direction at upper surface was increased due to detailing provisions (minimum ratio of tensile reinforcement)
N2/4	Note	The statically required tensile reinforcement in the second direction at upper surface was increased due to detailing provisions (minimum ratio of tensile reinforcement)
N2/5	Note	The statically required compressive reinforcement in the first direction at lower surface was increased due to detailing provisions (minimum ratio of compressive reinforcement)
N2/6	Note	The statically required compressive reinforcement in the second direction at lower surface was increased due to detailing provisions (minimum ratio of compressive reinforcement)
N2/7	Note	The statically required compressive reinforcement in the first direction at upper surface was increased due to detailing provisions (minimum ratio of compressive reinforcement)
N2/8	Note	The statically required compressive reinforcement in the second direction at upper surface was increased due to detailing provisions (minimum ratio of compressive reinforcement)
N2/9	Note	The statically required reinforcement in the first direction at lower surface was increased due to detailing provisions (minimum transverse reinforcement)
N2/10	Note	The statically required reinforcement in the second direction at lower surface was increased due to detailing provisions (minimum transverse reinforcement)
N2/11	Note	The statically required reinforcement in the first direction at upper surface was increased due to detailing provisions (minimum transverse reinforcement)
N2/12	Note	The statically required reinforcement in the second direction at upper surface was increased due to detailing provisions (minimum transverse reinforcement)
N2/13	Note	The statically required tensile reinforcement in the first direction at lower surface was increased due to detailing provisions (maximum spacing of main reinforcement)
N2/14	Note	The statically required tensile reinforcement in the second direction at lower surface was increased due to detailing provisions (maximum spacing of main reinforcement)
N2/15	Note	The statically required tensile reinforcement in the first direction at upper surface was increased due to detailing provisions (maximum spacing of main reinforcement)
N2/16	Note	The statically required tensile reinforcement in the second direction at upper surface was increased due to detailing provisions (maximum spacing of main reinforcement)
W2/1	Warning	The detailing provisions(maximum ratio of reinforcement) is exceeded in first direction at lower surface	To increase thickness of 2D member ,to increase quality of concrete or reinforcement or to change geometry of reinforcement (positions and directions)
W2/2	Warning	The detailing provisions(maximum ratio of reinforcement) is exceeded in second direction at lower surface	To increase thickness of 2D member ,to increase quality of concrete or reinforcement or to change geometry of reinforcement (positions and directions)
W2/3	Warning	The detailing provisions(maximum ratio of reinforcement) is exceeded in first direction at upper surface	To increase thickness of 2D member ,to increase quality of concrete or reinforcement or to change geometry of reinforcement (positions and directions)
W2/4	Warning	The detailing provisions(maximum ratio of reinforcement) is exceeded in second direction at upper surface	To increase thickness of 2D member ,to increase quality of concrete or reinforcement or to change geometry of reinforcement (positions and directions)